Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I would like this behaviour, I have attached an initial patch.
It enforces that the read actually starts with the adaptor - which is different
behaviour to the 3' trim which can allow a match.
Original comment by cas...@gmail.com
on 1 Oct 2011 at 7:22
Attachments:
Thanks a lot, this is really great! I've started to review and integrate the
patch, but I'm uncertain as to how the behavior should be in case the adapter
is found within the read. With your patch, such a match would be ignored, but I
have a report from another user who would like to get the adapter and the
preceding bases trimmed.
Both variants could be implemented of course, but that would add two more
command-line parameters of which there are quite a few already. Could you tell
me why it makes sense to ignore these matches within reads?
Original comment by marcel.m...@tu-dortmund.de
on 31 Oct 2011 at 11:13
Yes, having the adaptor with the preceeding bases trimmed would be ideal.
I think when I wrote the patch, the assumption that the trimming would be at
the back was quite integral to the code. However, a bigger patch could
probably do it better.
Original comment by cas...@gmail.com
on 31 Oct 2011 at 6:11
An updated version of your patch has been integrated into cutadapt in r214 --
thanks a lot!
Original comment by marcel.m...@tu-dortmund.de
on 2 Nov 2011 at 9:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
marcel.m...@tu-dortmund.de
on 29 Jun 2011 at 8:38