The Scxml Editor has no real competitor - regarding functionality and stability.
Congratulations.
But why C++ Builder from Embacadero?
What we read in the Web it is still crab - regarding reliability, customer handling and compatibility.
We decided years ago to abandon it, moved to Qt and we use today Clion as IDE. We just made some compatibility libs to speed up the port.
Only with such tools like yours Scxml in C++ can be used seriously.
But C++ builder is a no go. Sorry for that.
If you want help for porting we can provide some experiences.
This is definitely an opinion. You can delete it if you don't want it here.
The Scxml Editor has no real competitor - regarding functionality and stability.
Congratulations.
But why C++ Builder from Embacadero? What we read in the Web it is still crab - regarding reliability, customer handling and compatibility. We decided years ago to abandon it, moved to Qt and we use today Clion as IDE. We just made some compatibility libs to speed up the port.
Only with such tools like yours Scxml in C++ can be used seriously.
But C++ builder is a no go. Sorry for that. If you want help for porting we can provide some experiences.
This is definitely an opinion. You can delete it if you don't want it here.