Closed alfonsogarciacaro closed 6 years ago
@whitetigle Fable.VueJs is imaginative, this library is a binding, made and doped for the sole purpose of bridging an existing library (vuejs) with Fable, it doesn't need to have an identity of itself, there is not much to it but to bind and bind is the only Raison d'etre, therefore, Fable.VueJs it is
P.S. feel free to ignore and move on :joy:
Oh well it's just we had this very interesting discussion with you, and @selketjah and @MangelMaxime and if I remember it well it was about naming conventions.
What I do believe is that that for pure bindings we should keep the name of the library for the reasons you mentioned. But if we decide to add some helpers then I think we should try to be imaginative like @MangelMaxime did with Bulma/Fulma.
So Fable.VueJs is ok for me 👍
Fable.VueJs is descriptive enough for the project but @whitetigle thinks we should try to be a bit more imaginative with names so I'm open to other ideas :)