Open alfred-leong opened 2 years ago
Perhaps a better way to format the command summary table is to split it into 3 sub headers (one for each mode) instead of having to write (in Patient/Visit/Prescription ie. .......) after every command
This is a valid suggestion, but not required for the user to easily understand the command summary table
Team chose [response.NotInScope]
response.NotInScope
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Perhaps a better way to format the command summary table is to split it into 3 sub headers (one for each mode) instead of having to write (in Patient/Visit/Prescription ie. .......) after every command