Closed DevinCodes closed 2 years ago
It would seem that for this change to be really beneficial that the ObjectEncrypter would need to be resolved from the container. As is, extending this class doesn't have much benefit unless you also reimplement anywhere the class is called. If the ObjectEncrypter was resolved out of the container each time it is used, the developer would have full control over the functionality. In the end, this really may not be what is desired though.
Alternatively, another solution to possibly solve #293, and my use case, would be allowing the first part of the encrypted ObjectID to be configured. This way the developer nearly have full control of how the ObjectID is constructed.
This has a similar feel to me to how Laravel can configure morph maps to decouple values from their implementation. In the same way, we'd almost certainly need a map available at a global level so that decryption of the ObjectID and the Searhable model resolution could still work.
For my use case, I am looking into how to prevent the ObjectID from changing should the Model name ever change. Currently, if App\Models\Auto
was renamed to App\Models\Automobile
all analytics (I assume) would be lost for those search objects as the ObjectId would change from App\Models\Auto::1
to App\Models\Automobile::1
.
+1
Describe your change
This removes the
final
keyword from theObjectEncrypter
class, so its behavior can be customized. Please note that we don't provide support when you decide to override this class.