Closed a523 closed 3 years ago
This modified Wand builder can pass the following tests:
tests/input/xcf/test_xcf.py test_to_jpeg fails with wand backend. #114 tests/input/svg/test_svg.py test_to_jpeg fails with wand backend. #115 tests/input/pdf/test_pdf.py test_to_pdf fails with imconvert backend. #116 tests/input/pdf/test_pdf.py test_to_jpeg fails with wand backend. #117 tests/input/txt/test_txt.py test_text_to_jpeg fail with wand and imconvert backend.
You need to reintroduce white background to not have weird and poor quality result for file with transparency.
fixed with commit 24463a1408196f98f4b785f637d6e7e15b612eb8 and 1af97cca408075c809a521000dea74e9c92b5575
You should probably deprecate both Pillow and ImageMagick (command line) builder
fixed with 7572911de8c5bb208e38fcb235e731f7f3d22db7
But you need to see if replacing pillow with Wand when handlingapplication/postscript
files is your expectations. (Just need modify ImageMagick6 policy, then IM can work)
xcf and all raw image file are not supported by wand builder
fixed with 7572911de8c5bb208e38fcb235e731f7f3d22db7
There is no more quality/progressive/resample_algorithm options like in Pillow.
Yeah, quality/progressive/resample_algorithm there are all in ImageMagick.
I have created progressive JPEG image with -interlace Plane
option, 6dbd8d31
But quality and resample_algorithm are used by default value, if we want we can specify a value also.
You need to reintroduce white background to not have weird and poor quality result for file with transparency. fixed with commit 24463a1 and 1af97cc
@inkhey we lost several times the white background without to detect it before releasing. Do we have a dedicated test case? It would be interesting to have one in order to ensure quality based on automatic tests instead of developers watchfulness
You need to reintroduce white background to not have weird and poor quality result for file with transparency. fixed with commit 24463a1 and 1af97cc
@inkhey we lost several times the white background without to detect it before releasing. Do we have a dedicated test case? It would be interesting to have one in order to ensure quality based on automatic tests instead of developers watchfulness
@lebouquetin Yes, the test case is already included in the PR, commit :https://github.com/algoo/preview-generator/commit/1af97cca408075c809a521000dea74e9c92b5575
https://github.com/algoo/preview-generator/issues/271 https://github.com/algoo/preview-generator/issues/253
PR Goal
Now the image__wand builder can work as the previous pillow builder, them passed the same test cases. And replace pillow and Imagemagick(command line) builder with wand builder.
Implemented solution
Now the imagewand builder is the default builder for image files, and also the imagewand builder instead of pillow builder when other builder call How to modify wand ? The following information is referenced: https://legacy.imagemagick.org/Usage/thumbnails/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25438402/python-wand-how-to-resize-keeping-aspect-ratio-and-filling-in-the-remaining-spac/25452063#25452063
Checkpoints
Expected :185 Actual :181