We currently name the transaction visual image generically, which makes it hard to know the full transaction id/group id that the image was generated for (given values are shortened).
A few things to consider when implementing this:
We can generate an image for either transaction or a transaction group.
Transaction visual should include a transaction id.
Transaction group visual should include the round and group id.
Should we include the network id the data is applicable to?
We currently name the transaction visual image generically, which makes it hard to know the full transaction id/group id that the image was generated for (given values are shortened).
A few things to consider when implementing this: