Closed bilderbuchi closed 4 years ago
Thank you for the comments! The issue on p 347 is already fixed for the 2nd printing. I addressed the other two, so those will come out in the third printing.
Thanks @bilderbuchi and @tawheeler !
The issue on p 347 is already fixed for the 2nd printing.
Ah ok. I checked in the readme first, isn't mentioned there.
I initially only filled out mathematical / theory / factual issues in the errata, and skipped formatting issues like extra spaces. Its not your fault. I'll start to include those as well.
I see, no problem. I am happy that I could help, in any case. :-)
Hi!
I noticed a couple of minor issues (formatting etc):
x_7
andx_9
) has too much space before the equals sign, probably due to a stretching hspace or something like that.\mathcal
instead of\mathbb
, is what I would suspect in Latex.c^{(d)}
argument