Closed chelseas closed 2 years ago
We can certainly make some of these changes, like making symbols consistent with the text. If the comments fit we can probably add them.
Committed most of the changes from trust_region1.pdf
Committed many changes for alg 9.6
I'm not going to take the suggestion for the last pdf, as it will affect pagination. Also, whether it is uniformly at random or not is not really the point. Yes, we implement it to be uniform, but you don't have to.
Posted to the book site. Thanks!
Re: the last one ("uniformly at random"), I raised that point specifically because a student was confused. To say the samples are "chosen from the top k" is vague. You don't have to say "uniformly" at random, but I would change it to say "chosen at random" at least. Also you might want to include in the comments for the implementation of that algo that you implement it choosing "uniformly at random."
"chosen at random" does not fit on the page without more work.
I thought about it overnight and changed "choose" to "sample".
Sounds good to me! Thanks Tim and Chelsea!
I am opening another issue because students have been coming to me in office hours with confusion over the Julia code for the algorithms and requests for pseudo-code explanations. Here I am including for your consideration the marked up algorithm examples, versions of which I have sent to students to explain what is going on. trust_region 1.pdf
algo_9.6_revision.pdf
This is not an algo description but what I think would be a more clear and precise description of the algorithm: algo textbook pg 151_revisions.pdf