Open refob opened 3 years ago
Can somebody please take a look at this?
It works fine for me, but I have used the development version:
That's really GREAT news. Is there a compiled Win10 version that I could try?
On 04.06.2021 19:54, Fabien Castan wrote:
It works fine for me, but I have used the development version: image https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/153585/120843539-839b4e80-c56e-11eb-8548-159f12174539.png
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/alicevision/meshroom/issues/1204#issuecomment-854904062, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASKHOTM627OGJRLYLJJLL3DTREHMBANCNFSM4VQMYHNQ.
Unfortunately, we don't have a nightly build system in place... Try to use dspsift instead of sift, it's now the default in the development version.
Describe the bug I ran meshroom 6 times using the same setup and got 6 different results (=different looking meshes). I used only one camera (see https://en.openscan.eu/openscan-mini), but meshroom seems to detect many of them at different distances. The same set of images are detected by VisualSFM w/o problems (see screenshots).
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior Reproducible results are expected. Only one camera should be detected at similiar distances from the object.
Screenshots
Model pictures:
Result 2. run:
Result 3. run:
Result 4. run:
VisualSFM camera detection:
Log
EXIF data:
Desktop (please complete the following and other pertinent information):
Additional context Hardware: Intel i7-5960X CPU, 3.00 GHz, 32GB Ram Windows 10 Pro, Version 2004 GeForce GTX 980 Ti, Nvidia driver 457.30 Cuda V11.1.74