Closed Gorecraft closed 5 years ago
Did you try processing the images with default values? I was able to reconstruct SEM images from screenshots (!) of images from this paper 3D Demo: https://skfb.ly/6JozU
If this is not accurate enough for you,I think you should be able to estimate the "camera intrinsic" parameters. There are a few papers discussing SEM photogrammetry and camera calibration such as: http://www.irisa.fr/lagadic/pdf/2014_icra_cui.pdf, http://www.irisa.fr/lagadic/pdf/2015_ijom_cui.pdf or https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01644885/document
If you have a calibration pattern, you could maybe use it to get these parameters as well. https://github.com/alicevision/meshroom/issues/921 https://boofcv.org/index.php?title=Tutorial_Camera_Calibration https://docs.opencv.org/2.4/modules/calib3d/doc/camera_calibration_and_3d_reconstruction.html It would be interesting to see how a calibration pattern works on this scale.
Microphotogrammetry experiments if someone is interested: http://fab.cba.mit.edu/classes/864.20/people/camron/microphotogrammetry/final.html
Hello, i want to use scanning electron microscopy images and therefore i don't have a camera sensor but a scanned area and an electron detector. What informations should i provide for "camera intrinsic"? focal length is more or less the working distance and sensor width the "true" width of the image (width of the scanned area)? Thanks and regards