Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Interesting ! Will have a look at it.
Sorry for the data loss :-( Concerning incremental save it's the next big step I
think: Keep track of all recorded tracks in a database, and allow user to
re-export
previous ones.
Original comment by nguillau...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2010 at 5:29
It works on my 1.6 device. Can you remind me which device and Android version
you're
using please ?
Original comment by nguillau...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2010 at 5:35
Just tested on Android 2.1 and seems to work too.
Original comment by nguillau...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2010 at 5:47
My weapon is an ADP1 with CyanogenMod 4.2.15.1 which is Android-1.6 based but
has some
apps and interfaces back-ported from newer AOSP code.
I have not seen this problem with any other app, including ones that play audio
and
get interrupted by an alarm and those that use the gps and get interrupted. For
example Vespuci ticks right along saving my track even when hit with a
foreground
alarm going off.
Original comment by alerque
on 10 Apr 2010 at 7:45
Do you know if CyanogenMod is shipped with the default Alarm Clock, or a
replacement
program ? I read some things about that, but I'm not sure:
* http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?/topic/459-alarm-clock-42141-or-later/
* http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=567610 (See "Music and DeskClock
apps from Eclair")
* http://www.cyanogenmod.com/home/cyanogenmod-4-2-14
Original comment by nguillau...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2010 at 1:00
It is neither the "default" alarm clock nor a "replacement program" -- it is a
back-
port of the stock android alarm clock but a newer version than originally
shipped
with the core rom. This arrangement is generally quite stable, I have had
absolutely
no other FC's or even minor hiccups with anything else besides a task killer
program
that everybody has problems with. The alarms themselves run like clockwork
(excuse
the pun) and no other programs react badly to the popup snooze/end window.
The only other thing that comes to mind is that I do run the Turkish locale. I
haven't had trouble recently but using alternate locales does have a long
history of
causing problems, esp with newly developed apps -- but I've seen mentions of a
couple
translations of osmtracker so I don't know what specifically this would be.
Original comment by alerque
on 10 Apr 2010 at 8:27
One more thing I just noticed. Apparently it is only a problem if the program
is tracking. Having an alarm
pop up up with just the program up with no active track has no adverse effect.
Original comment by alerque
on 11 Apr 2010 at 5:21
I've lost data too, but not for an alarm. I spent an hour making a detailed
track
with the map view on the whole time (with phone display locked). When I was
nearly
finished, I unlocked the phone and found the map display blank. OSMTracker
refused to
respond. I left the phone as is hoping it would recover.
Five minutes later, I received a call. When I went back to OSMTracker, the map
display was working again, but OSMTracker was no longer tracking (it had
apparently
been shutdown and restarted again by Android). I could see the map, but the
"Save &
Exit" menu option had reverted to "Start Tracking", which was disabled pending
a GPS
fix.
As I had no option, I went back outdoors, waited for a GPS fix, clicked "Start
Tracking", and found my entire detailed track gone.
My SD card has a folder for both traces, but the first one, which should have
had the
detailed trace, is blank. OSMTracker crashed without saving.
Original comment by jackerhack
on 25 Apr 2010 at 4:21
Sorry for the data loss :-( I still don't know exactly what is causing that, I
can't
reproduce it. However I'll try to find a workaround... Can you tell me which
device
and Android version you have ? Thanks.
Original comment by nguillau...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2010 at 8:35
The "data lost" shouldn't occur again now that v0.5.x has the ability to
re-export previous tracks.
Original comment by nguillau...@gmail.com
on 4 Oct 2010 at 5:12
Original comment by nicolas@guillaumin.me
on 29 Jul 2012 at 8:41
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
alerque
on 9 Apr 2010 at 7:31