Open Prince213 opened 3 years ago
Yes, though there are still some problems to be fixed. I'm working on that. What do you think of making neatroff work on Windows?
Sizhe Zhao @.***> wrote:
Yes, though there are still some problems to be fixed. I'm working on that. What do you think of making neatroff work on windows?
I wonder how big the changes are.
I am not much familiar with Windows; is this for building Neatroff natively or using Cygwin?
I also wonder if there are many that use Neatroff on Windows.
Ali
Natively. Since it can already compile for Windows, I would say the code won't need to change too much. The problems left are probably path handling, encoding handling, and relocatability support. As for Cygwin, it's probably fine to treat it as a Unix variant.
The changes in this very PR is enough to compile it on Windows.
Sizhe Zhao @.***> wrote:
The changes in this very PR is enough to compile it on Windows.
How about other Neatroff programs? If the amount of required changes are large, I think it is cleaner to maintain a Windows port in separate branches.
Thanks, Ali
Other programs can be compiled without change. However, work are required to make them work properly.
Sizhe Zhao @.***> wrote:
@Prince213 pushed 1 commit.
9673b2b017768da879eb358f9910d46602244a7f otf.c: Set stdin to binary mode on Windows
Thank you very much.
To make the code base simpler, I think it helps to concentrate on POSIX, only. We can keep the changes required to build neat* natively on Windows in separate branches, which are kept up-to-date with the master branch; we can add a link to this branch in README. I think all of neatroff, neatpost, and neatmkfn (and probably neatroff_make) need to be changed. Is there an easy way of keeping all changes in a single repository?
Ali
Instead of maintaining separate branches or repos, I would suggest creating a platform abstraction layer. You can extract POSIX-related code to a separate file, implement OS-independent functions with POSIX-specific code, and use those functions instead. This can make the code more portable and focus on logic itself.
Hi,
Sizhe Zhao @.***> wrote:
Thanks for the patch.
Do other Neatroff programs compile on Windows?