r<CR>

[polluks]

I expected a line split... but it behaves as D without yanking.

[aligrudi]

Stefan @.***> wrote:

I suspected a line split... but it behaves as D without yanking.

Must be fixed now.

Thanks, Ali

[polluks]

Better... what about an extra refresh?

[aligrudi]

Stefan @.***> wrote:

Better... what about an extra refresh?

For commands that usually modify a single line, such as ~, r, D, and x, only the current line is updated, unless xrow or xleft changes, in which case the whole screen is updated. Do you mean the update in the second case?

Ali

[polluks]

I was thinking of r<CR> should be equivalent to i<CR><ESC>, therefore the second case.

[aligrudi]

Stefan @.***> wrote:

I was thinking of r<CR> should be equivalent to i<CR><ESC>, therefore the second case.

OK.

Sorry, I am not sure if I understand the second problem. Do you mean that neatvi must redraw the screen but it does not, or that neatvi redraws the screen unnecessarily?

Ali

[kyx0r]

Hello Ali,

I think the confusion is that in your version mod = 2 redraws more than 1 line. This op has to redraw 2 lines, original and the new line. That would imply comment about mod = 2 is wrong.

Kind Regards, Kyryl

[aligrudi]

Hello Kyryl.

Kyryl @.***> wrote:

I think the confusion is that in your version mod = 2 redraws more than 1 line. This op has to redraw 2 lines, original and the new line. That would imply comment about mod = 2 is wrong.

Is it OK then? I was worried that the screen is not updated in some cases.

Ali

[polluks]

works fine but...

[...]
test/e14.sh: Failed
--- /tmp/.neatvi1   2024-06-25 20:25:02
+++ /tmp/.neatvi2   2024-06-25 20:25:02
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-a
 b
 c

[aligrudi]

Stefan @.***> wrote:

works fine but...

[...]
test/e14.sh: Failed
--- /tmp/.neatvi1 2024-06-25 20:25:02
+++ /tmp/.neatvi2 2024-06-25 20:25:02
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-a
 b
 c

Thanks, fixed.

Missed this one after renaming ye command to rs. Now we have rs and rx.

Ali