Closed lzgirlcat closed 11 months ago
Patch coverage: 100.00%
and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
9a98ac2
) 96.58% compared to head (f2fad7a
) 96.58%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
First up, apologies for the very delayed feedback.
Changing the signature of the reset
method only for redis related storages isn't the right way to go as it breaks the contract from the abstract base class (reference).
An alternate approach would you consider adding namespace
as an optional argument to the constructors of the redis storage classes and that namespace could be used by the reset methods.
I believe #183 provides a sufficient solution to what this PR was trying to solve.
add namespace param to reset func