Closed sattar-hazrati closed 5 years ago
Hey Sattar! Thanks for filing an issue.
This is a known issue with seasonal ARIMAs with large m
values. In our next release (v1.2.0) we will be adding new tests of seasonality which should help speed things up (see #88). Currently, seasonal differencing tests default to the CH (canova-hansen) test. We've got OCSB implemented and it will be the new default in v1.2.0, so you should see some speed-ups there.
That said, though, at the end of the day seasonal ARIMAs with large m
are always going to run a bit slow. Since we delegate those model fits down to statmodels, there's not a ton that can be done for that... even R chokes on those models. :-(
If you'd like to build the bleeding edge and try your model with the OCSB
test (default), you'll have to build the package from source until it's released:
$ git clone -b develop git@github.com:tgsmith61591/pmdarima.git
$ cd pmdarima
$ python setup.py develop
Hi Sattar,
Did you find a work around long period of seasonality i.e. large value of m? I am also facing the same issue currently.
Closing since #103 is the exact same, but with more detail
Description
I have one year daily data. and want to predict 30 days. for this work i set this parameters arima = pm.auto_arima(train, error_action='ignore', trace=1,seasonal=True, m=365) my problem is that very long run time for each model is it correct to set m= 365 for daily data?
Steps/Code to Reproduce
Expected Results
Actual Results
Versions