Closed aaronreidsmith closed 2 years ago
Only remaining warnings are these, which I think is fine? They are on our side at least, and I think we are intentionally creating those warnings. Could be wrong
=============================== warnings summary ===============================
tests/test_pipeline.py::test_pipeline_predict_inverse_transform[True-True-X0-pipeline5]
tests/test_pipeline.py::test_pipeline_predict_inverse_transform[True-True-X1-pipeline5]
/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.7.12/x[64](https://github.com/alkaline-ml/pmdarima/runs/6054174506?check_suite_focus=true#step:11:64)/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pmdarima/preprocessing/endog/boxcox.py:161: RuntimeWarning: overflow encountered in exp
return np.exp(y) - lam2, exog
tests/test_pipeline.py::test_pipeline_predict_inverse_transform[True-True-X0-pipeline6]
tests/test_pipeline.py::test_pipeline_predict_inverse_transform[True-True-X1-pipeline6]
/Users/runner/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.7.12/x64/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pmdarima/preprocessing/endog/boxcox.py:165: RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in power
de_exp = numer ** (1. / lam1) # de-exponentiate
Description
This PR makes it so if we push a commit to the same branch, it will cancel previous builds on GHA, saving us some cycles.
It also fixes a couple warnings in the build:
np.int
->int
np.bool
->bool
np.float
->float
LinearRegression(normalize=True)
was apparently deprecated by sklearn in favor ofmake_pipeline(StandardScaler(with_mean=False), LinearRegression())
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist:
N/A