allada
commented
9 years ago Sorry, I missed this issue. Yes, they removed support for the default function which grouped some barcode types together and now they are always broken out. As in the following code:
typedef enum {
BAR_ALL=0,
BAR_UPC,
BAR_CODABAR,
BAR_CODE25_NI2OF5,
BAR_CODE25_I2OF5,
BAR_CODE39,
BAR_CODE93,
BAR_CODE128,
BAR_CODE11,
BAR_CPCBINARY,
BAR_DUN14,
BAR_EAN2,
BAR_EAN5,
BAR_EAN8,
BAR_EAN13,
BAR_EAN128,
BAR_GS1DATABAR,
BAR_ITF14,
BAR_LATENT_IMAGE,
BAR_PHARMACODE,
BAR_PLANET,
BAR_POSTNET,
BAR_INTELLIGENT_MAIL,
BAR_MSI,
BAR_POSTBAR,
BAR_RM4SCC,
BAR_TELEPEN,
BAR_PLESSEY,
BAR_PDF417,
BAR_MICROPDF417,
BAR_DATAMATRIX,
BAR_AZTEK,
BAR_QRCODE,
BAR_MAXICODE,
BAR_LAST
}BARCODES;
typedef enum {
BAR_EX_ALL=0,
BAR_EX_UPCA,
BAR_EX_CODABAR,
BAR_EX_CODE25_NI2OF5,
BAR_EX_CODE25_I2OF5,
BAR_EX_CODE39,
BAR_EX_CODE93,
BAR_EX_CODE128,
BAR_EX_CODE11,
BAR_EX_CPCBINARY,
BAR_EX_DUN14,
BAR_EX_EAN2,
BAR_EX_EAN5,
BAR_EX_EAN8,
BAR_EX_EAN13,
BAR_EX_EAN128,
BAR_EX_GS1DATABAR,
BAR_EX_ITF14,
BAR_EX_LATENT_IMAGE,
BAR_EX_PHARMACODE,
BAR_EX_PLANET,
BAR_EX_POSTNET,
BAR_EX_INTELLIGENT_MAIL,
BAR_EX_MSI_PLESSEY,
BAR_EX_POSTBAR,
BAR_EX_RM4SCC,
BAR_EX_TELEPEN,
BAR_EX_UK_PLESSEY,
BAR_EX_PDF417,
BAR_EX_MICROPDF417,
BAR_EX_DATAMATRIX,
BAR_EX_AZTEK,
BAR_EX_QRCODE,
BAR_EX_MAXICODE,
BAR_EX_RESERVED1,
BAR_EX_RESERVED2,
BAR_EX_RESERVED3,
BAR_EX_RESERVED4,
BAR_EX_RESERVED5,
BAR_EX_UPCA_2,
BAR_EX_UPCA_5,
BAR_EX_UPCE,
BAR_EX_UPCE_2,
BAR_EX_UPCE_5,
BAR_EX_EAN13_2,
BAR_EX_EAN13_5,
BAR_EX_EAN8_2,
BAR_EX_EAN8_5,
BAR_EX_CODE39_FULL,
BAR_EX_ITA_PHARMA,
BAR_EX_CODABAR_ABC,
BAR_EX_CODABAR_CX,
BAR_EX_SCODE,
BAR_EX_MATRIX_2OF5,
BAR_EX_IATA,
BAR_EX_KOREAN_POSTAL,
BAR_EX_CCA,
BAR_EX_CCB,
BAR_EX_CCC,
BAR_EX_LAST
}BARCODES_EX;I did not "fix" this, because there was no way to make it reverse compatible because it's something IPCPrint no longer supports and would require a change in the "old" versions, which is not possible.
I'd suggest making sure your code always changed the barcode type to "EXTENDED" when device is initialized.
The Linea device is now shipped with a new firmware version. That version seems not to be fully compatible with the older version (our older devices running on 5.24.0).
At least the ids of different barcode types have changed: EAN-13 has changed from 14 to 66 Interleave 2of5 has changed from 4 to 78
We didn't investigate that case in detail by now, but wanted to report it as soon as possible as there is likely an update needed for everybody who gets new devices.