MIT license is fine for the software, and is included in this repo.
A separate license, Creative Commons most likely, should be provided (in settings) for works created using the software. Meaning, the book deliverables. This should be customizable based on the individual installation of the software, and should be independent of the MIT license.
I'd like to have a default license, maybe the Creative Commons "Attribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SA" license which seems broadly equivalent to the MIT, but allow users to substitute the license with which they feel most comfortable.
Perhaps the MIT is for users seeing code, on GitHub, and the CC license would be for the front-end, for users seeing rendered English?
I should probably talk with a lawyer about how to integrate this stuff.
MIT license is fine for the software, and is included in this repo.
A separate license, Creative Commons most likely, should be provided (in settings) for works created using the software. Meaning, the book deliverables. This should be customizable based on the individual installation of the software, and should be independent of the MIT license.
I'd like to have a default license, maybe the Creative Commons "Attribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SA" license which seems broadly equivalent to the MIT, but allow users to substitute the license with which they feel most comfortable.
Perhaps the MIT is for users seeing code, on GitHub, and the CC license would be for the front-end, for users seeing rendered English?
I should probably talk with a lawyer about how to integrate this stuff.