Closed wilianmaique closed 2 years ago
why is that an issue in the first place ?
The problem is in being able to modify a code where it was not supposed to be possible, this is a big problem, the idea is to make it even more difficult. We know that those who really know how to 'reverse engineer' it is almost impossible to protect a code.
i don't see any benefits in doing that
AMXX is under GNU 3 licence:
The GNU General Public License (GNU, GPL, or GPL) is a free software license originally written by Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation, which guarantees that users are free to use, share, and modify the software without paying anyone for it.
i don't see any benefits in doing that
AMXX is under GNU 3 licence:
The GNU General Public License (GNU, GPL, or GPL) is a free software license originally written by Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation, which guarantees that users are free to use, share, and modify the software without paying anyone for it.
I'm talking about plugins themselves...
which are also on the same license
which are also on the same license
if that were the case we would have to see so many things wrong on the internet, but that's not how it works my friend
just because people do bad things doesn't mean we have to do it too
Per the AMX Mod X license, binaries must have the accompanying source available.
Anyone who messes with 'PAWN' for a long time knows about the 'lysis decompiler' 'amxx uncompress'
both serve to 'decompile' at least a little, now the 'amxx uncompress' is possible to edit texts and then recompile and the plugin still works!
I was wondering if there is anything I can do to prevent this? or make it even more difficult.