Feature/mpp 695/insurance

[joyet-simon]

Reason for change

Linear task

Code changes

How to test

As a reviewer, you are encouraged to test the PR locally.

Checklist for authors and reviewers

• [ ] The title of the PR uses business wording, not technical jargon, for the changelog readers to understand it
• [ ] The PR implements the changes asked in the referenced task / issue
• [ ] The automated tests are compliant with the testing strategy
• [ ] The tests are relevant, and cover the corner/error cases, not only the happy path
• [ ] You understand the impact of this PR on existing code/features
• [ ] The changes include adequate logging and Datadog traces
• [ ] Documentation is updated (API, developer documentation, ADR, Notion...)

Non applicable

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

1 Security Hotspot
8.4% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)
4 New Critical Issues (required ≤ 0)
B Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)
27 New Blocker Issues (required ≤ 0)
2 New Bugs (required ≤ 0)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint