Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I did some experiments for the current unreleased version. I tried a pull
parser and it didn't really make any real difference to parse times.
I did however optimise a few things and the parser is a lot faster now (>2X).
The biggest improvement came from implementing a custom float parser. The new
number parser is around 6X faster than the standard one in Java/Android.
I may do some testing with kXML and see whether it does offer a significant
improvement.
What speed difference are you seeing between your version of svg-android and
AndroidSVG parsing-wise?
Original comment by paul.leb...@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2014 at 11:49
Thanks for the feedback.
If you want to see better what I mean, you can try Cruiser (an Android map
application using mapsforge).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cruiser
You'll need also a vector map from
http://download.mapsforge.org/
Zoom in at street level inside a city and you'll see the rendered svg POI.
If I compare side by side our map viewer using svg-android-2 (kXML) and
androidsvg,
I see that there is notable delay at svg rendering with androidsvg, specially
at areas where there are plenty of svg symbols.
We experienced that kind of delay when we tried the svg-android-2 with its
original SAX parser.
If you want I can try any beta version of androidsvg to test its performance.
Original comment by devemu...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2014 at 7:19
Thanks for the offer to do some beta testing.
I've uploaded a beta version of 1.2.2 to the downloads page. It should also be
available on the maven central repository soon.
androidsvg-1.2.2-beta-1.jar
Obviously AndroidSVG will probably never be as fast as svg-android for many
reasons. In order to properly render all files, there are things it has to do
that make it slower.
Original comment by paul.leb...@gmail.com
on 16 Jun 2014 at 7:45
I try androidsvg-1.2.2-beta-1 as svg parser for mapsforge in Cruiser Beta:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=gr.talent.cruiser.beta
Have you included at your latest beta version any performance improvements?
Original comment by devemu...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2014 at 10:26
Yes. 1.2.2 has a bunch of parsing speed improvements. So you didn't notice any
difference?
Original comment by paul.leb...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2014 at 12:48
Yes, I think there is performance improvement (I asked to be sure).
Is in your plans to try also the kXML?
Thanks for publishing the beta version also on Maven.
Original comment by devemu...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2014 at 4:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
devemu...@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2014 at 8:02