Open GenericUser127 opened 10 months ago
Hi @GenericUser127 thanks for your contributions to this open source package! I'm pretty excited to see that you found an area for a potential speed-up and I'll look into it before I approve to make sure it's not breaking tests and is keeping the same functionality. I don't know if I want to bump up the numpy version just because I like the idea of backwards compatibility and older users being able to use the package -- but if you have other thoughts I would be happy to discuss further?
Hi @nehargupta , thanks for the reply.
Please do verify for yourself but we did run the included unit tests on these changes and confirmed they still all passed.
Regarding the Numpy version bump, that was the result of running a Mend check against it and it identifying a vulnerability.
As it is not required for this functionality change, I can remove it from this PR if that is what you prefer?
Thanks!
Hi @nehargupta , is this ready to merge? Thank you!
Hi @nehargupta, I was doing some maintenance and merged master into the branch. Is this ready to merge? Thanks!
Hi @brianwarner Thanks for your work on this! Yeah I think I would prefer the numpy bump in a separate PR but the .loc instead of the for loop is a good idea at quick glance (I still need to run the tests though), thanks for noticing those and for your work!
Updated the PR to remove the Numpy version bump @nehargupta , please let me know if there is anything else you need
Also bumping Numpy to a more secure version