Open SashaPshenychniy opened 8 years ago
Hello,
Do you want to handle this and submit a PR? Or I can look myself later. Thank you for catching it.
By the way, you can use DateTime?
as Nullable<DateTime>
, it is a sugar :)
Currently I'm busy, but later I can fix it. Also I extended your library with support of author, images and publication source, but it's not well tested yet and also I need to get response from our lawyers about legal side since we do a commercial product.
PS: I didn't write DateTime? not to confuse you with question mark in a sentence =).
from our lawyers about legal side since we do a commercial product.
Currently I set MIT to be flexible. This license allows almost everything. With LGPL, you will have to push back your change to the library. If LGPL is fine, I will move to it. I used to use MPL and It could be see as lesser strict alternative to LGPL.
Ok for DateTime?
;)
According to specification
but source code doesn't handle it's absense correctly.
Data type for publication date should be Nullable< DateTime > instead of DateTime.