Closed lfdebrux closed 1 year ago
this would also make it easier to onboard the new devs
Things that I would consider being in scope for this: anything exported by govuk-prototype-kit
including routes API, filters API, etc. The JSON format we expect for plugins in govuk-prototype-kit-config.json
, also which options we allow in app/config.json
. Maybe also the blocks we have in layouts?
Some things to consider using for this include automated doc generation from JSDoc, JSON schema for configuration files for automated checking tools, that sort of thing. Keeping docs up-to-date is a difficult job.
Some existing (but out of date) developer docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DMu3MVB4iz3QI_xi93Ynw6-esLts-t-o9dY5zpevwLs/edit#heading=h.g0dcse92dyh7
We're improving the situation somewhat in PR #1877, not sure if I feel this is entirely done yet though. I think it would be nice to have a wider coverage of JSDoc comments. However, that is probably a long-term goal.
Cause
We have a slowly growing programming interface for the prototype kit. This is documented from a user perspective at https://prototype-kit.service.gov.uk, but we don't have anything in the way of more traditional API documentation collecting together all the different methods and configuration options.
Consequence
For developers of the kit it's hard to know what we do and don't support already when planning implementation of new features. For people trying to write code that integrates with the kit (such as plugin developers) it is hard to know what they can do with the kit.
Impact of debt
Medium
Cost to pay down
High