It turns out that at least in the Alpheios treebank data files, the enclytic/proclytic isn't always marked with a - . I can't really see any harm in testing the next/previous word whether or not it has a hyphen, can you?
Coverage increased (+0.005%) to 40.035% when pulling 0794b417225376dcd22959c22a3876cb2bf6e985 on i800 into 0085d9bf60831b6483b52ae44a829f45dae30b5f on gardener_widget.
It turns out that at least in the Alpheios treebank data files, the enclytic/proclytic isn't always marked with a - . I can't really see any harm in testing the next/previous word whether or not it has a hyphen, can you?