search

alpheios-project / inflection-tables

Inflection Table Library
ISC License
3 stars 1 forks source link

Irregular verbs: compounds of sum #70

Closed monzug closed 6 years ago

monzug commented 6 years ago

all the compounds verbs of sum such as adsum (and absum), desum, insum, intersum, praesum, obsum, prosum, subsum, supersum are missing the correspondent irregular table. I think we should show the irregular sum table. e.g. pro-sum and not pros-um for the verb

abrasax commented 6 years ago

yes.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 7:36 AM, monzug notifications@github.com wrote:

all the compounds verbs of sum such as adsum (and absum), desum, insum, intersum, praesum, obsum, prosum, subsum, supersum are missing the correspondent irregular table. I think we should show the irregular sum table. e.g. pro-sum and not pros-um for the verb

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/alpheios-project/inflection-tables/issues/70, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFX1E7ejTpN-3IUJ3_A9PvYeHsoKNeLAks5uKam8gaJpZM4VhqM1 .

balmas commented 6 years ago

@monzug do you mean you want to show the sum table as it currently is (or will be when #83 is fixed) or do you want to show tables that have the conjugations for each of these explicitly, (e.g. a table which has adsum ades etc. ?

balmas commented 6 years ago

I think it might require a small code change to show the sum table for the other verbs, whereas showing individual tables would mean adding the data for those tables to our data file (which I would probably ask you to do). So yes, less work for you :-)

balmas commented 6 years ago

@monzug : question is the above an exhaustive list of the sum compounds? Or are there many more?

balmas commented 6 years ago

@monzug From your comments in https://github.com/alpheios-project/morph-client/issues/15 it seems that the other irregular verb tables (fero, volo, eo, possum) are also for other irregular verbs. Is that correct? I.e. would we want to show the table for volo for malo and nolo?

monzug commented 6 years ago

if we show individual tables for each compounds verb, we should do also for malo and nolo. if not, let me look if they can use the volo ones.

monzug commented 6 years ago

malo and nolo are compounds of volo. nolo is for ne-volo and malo is for ma-volo. looking at the table for nolo, we have non vis, non vult, non vultis that would require an additional footnotes in the volo table. maybe showing each table would be better?

monzug commented 6 years ago

compound verb of sum: preposition ab, ad, de, in, inter, ob, prae, pro, prod, sub, super prosum may need its own table because pro retains the d before the e so prodes, prodest etc fero and all compounds are treated as 3rd conjugation verbs, so are edo and do eo has few compound verb such as adeo, ineo, veneo, queo facio is treated as 3rd conj this is the list of Allen&Greenough. I know there is also inquam can we add the verb irregular from drop-down for all irregular verbs and if inflection table is not available, a message pops up saying that table is not available yet?

balmas commented 6 years ago

I have alrady added the table for prosum. We will also implement #109 . I am going to add separate issues for each of the new tables we need to add for the irregular verbs and push them off until the next release.

balmas commented 6 years ago

closing this in favor of the individual issues.