Whitaker: wrong lemma for afore-> future infinitive active for absum

[monzug]

Whitaker is missing the information about the verb absum. we do not have a match because alpheios looks for afore as verb and not absum Is there anything that can be done to fix this from our side?

[balmas]

The only solution for the moment would be to add copies of the inflection data for adsum under the afore as the lemma. Do you want to do that?

[monzug]

sure. would it be like this?

absum | abesse_abfui_abfuturus | afore |   | infinitive | future

add the following

afore | --- | afore |   | infinitive | future

[balmas]

yes, but I think you have to duplicate all of the entries for absum in order to get the full tables.

[monzug]

can you please give me an example of the entries then if I have to duplicate the absum verb? not sure what to do

[balmas]

well, actually, what do you want the table to say? Should it just be this one table with that one row ?

[monzug]

to match Whitaker I can add the ending abfore and then a footnote for afore. I need to find a table in latin grammars to see which one is more commonly used. I don't like the idea to create a table just for one match

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:07 PM Bridget Almas notifications@github.com wrote:

well, actually, what do you want the table to say? Should it just be this one table with that one row ?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/alpheios-project/alpheios-core/issues/501#issuecomment-670215414, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ32UOJTGR3KGNFBYO53C73R7MSTHANCNFSM4PVQMQ5A .

[balmas]

Ok. Honestly I think unless afore is a really common form, I would probably just let it be as it is right now move this issue to the morphsvc repo so that we can take care of it when we add the ability to override the morph data returned by Whitaker.

[monzug]

yes, let's move to morphsvc repo. Thanks!

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 7:50 AM Bridget Almas notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok. Honestly I think unless afore is a really common form, I would probably just let it be as it is right now move this issue to the morphsvc repo so that we can take care of it when we add the ability to override the morph data returned by Whitaker.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/alpheios-project/alpheios-core/issues/501#issuecomment-670478659, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ32UOLKYBYMNOA3ES7VDATR7PS7TANCNFSM4PVQMQ5A .