search

alps-io / imports

Collection of imported vocabularies from other sources (e.g. IANA, Schema.org, microformats, etc.) converted into ALPS documents.
https://alps-io.github.io/imports/
7 stars 2 forks source link

imports from schema.org #1

Closed JDureau closed 10 years ago

JDureau commented 10 years ago

The imports from schema.org is not exhaustive, some profiles are missing (dataset, for example). Is there any specific reason for this?

Thanks.

mamund commented 10 years ago

@JDureau:

Sorry for the lack of response (holidays, etc.).

We started working through Schema.org as a test for the test and to help us learn more about existing vocabularies. While a full set is desirable, it's not an immediate goal for @leonardr and myself ATM.

However...

It would be really sweet if someone (hint-hint, wink-wink) would be willing to pick up the gauntlet and work through the full Schema.org suite. I'd be happy to hand you access to this repo for starters. I'll warn you that the format is not solid stone yet and the translations will likely need tending for the near term.

But we're more than happy to share the load here. Who knows, working through the full set might uncover additional important items that will affect the final format design.

So, interested in joining up and pitching in?

kernicus commented 10 years ago

I am up for helping out. Just point me in the right direction.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:09 PM, Mike Amundsen notifications@github.com wrote:

@JDureau:

Sorry for the lack of response (holidays, etc.).

We started working through Schema.org as a test for the test and to help us learn more about existing vocabularies. While a full set is desirable, it's not an immediate goal for @leonardr and myself ATM.

However...

It would be really sweet if someone (hint-hint, wink-wink) would be willing to pick up the gauntlet and work through the full Schema.org suite. I'd be happy to hand you access to this repo for starters. I'll warn you that the format is not solid stone yet and the translations will likely need tending for the near term.

But we're more than happy to share the load here. Who knows, working through the full set might uncover additional important items that will affect the final format design.

So, interested in joining up and pitching in?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

mamund commented 10 years ago

@kernicus

cool. added you for push/pull/admin in the imports repo.

we can continue the convo here in the repo.

kernicus commented 10 years ago

@mamund

Is there an API or at least an HTML page I can crawl the get the full scheme.org profile set?

mamund commented 10 years ago

no API right now. I'd just point WGET here: http://alps.io/schema.org/ and have it recursively pull all the pages.

keep in mind that the spec is still in flux and these pages might change (layout) over time.

cool?

kernicus commented 10 years ago

Cool. Will do. Will create a process for updating the files on a regular basis.

On Jan 15, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Mike Amundsen notifications@github.com wrote:

no API right now. I'd just point WGET here: http://alps.io/schema.org/ and have it recursively pull all the pages.

keep in mind that the spec is still in flux and these pages might change (layout) over time.

cool?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

mamund commented 10 years ago

sounds good. closing out this thread. cheers.

JDureau commented 10 years ago

@mamund, thanks a lot for your answer, and sorry for the time to answer. We have been working to update our profiles to RDFa, and will be looking into adapting it to alps when it stabilizes.

@kernicus, I'd be very happy to help with the integration of schema.org!

mamund commented 10 years ago

@JDureau - no problem. i was reading your blog post earlier today and wondering how things were going. i am very much interested in what you're working on esp. interested to see how RDFa will translate into valid ALPS.

looking forward to seeing how the project progresses.