Closed raffaem closed 4 months ago
I don't know how much of this would be opinionated, or if it is a standard. For example, this could better support Zotero, but make it worse for Mendeley (personally I don't use any for citations). Also many conferences vary in citation styles.
I stumbled on this issue when upgrading from v0.9 to v0.10.x.
In v0.9, date
was working flawlessly for me.
Due to the new group_by
behavior, the date
field is no longer working. al-folio now expects a year
field.
My Solution was to tell Zotero to use the Better Bibtex
instead of the Better BibLaTex
format. The former one uses year
.
There are some differences from the field exported by Zotero (at least the BetterBibTex plugin) and the ones al-folio expects:
journaltitle
andshortjournal
, while al-folio expectsjournal
date
(ISO 8601 format, e.g. "2023-07-01"), while al-folio expects ayear
url
, while al-folio expectspdf