Closed ViZhe closed 2 years ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | f59c7a719cd8dbd06a27551899630d82a04561ec |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/qui-docs/deploys/62668dfba8ed380009b851eb |
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | f59c7a719cd8dbd06a27551899630d82a04561ec |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/qui-max/deploys/62668dfbb39f100008016774 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-276--qui-max.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.
should be rebased after https://github.com/Qvant-lab/qui-max/pull/275
partially fix #274 and fix #86
For some reason, the code of external packages(date-fns, object-hash and etc) still in final bundle even if you don't use QDatapicker or QTable. I assume this can be possible resolved by marking them as peerDeps, but i doubt that this is the best decision, so this situation requires further separated investigation.
Maybe export with original module name via preserveModules: true
. is the best decision.
partially fix #274 and fix #86 For some reason, the code of external packages(date-fns, object-hash and etc) still in final bundle even if you don't use QDatapicker or QTable. I assume this can be possible resolved by marking them as peerDeps, but i doubt that this is the best decision, so this situation requires further separated investigation.
Maybe export with original module name via
preserveModules: true
. is the best decision.
oy, it seems like my purerage was a bit too much ;) thank for the tip with preserveModules it's really more shakeable, though external deps are now in dist. I dont think it's that bad, at least for a step, anyway project needs some structural and build changes so we continue work on it.
partially fix #274 and fix #86
For some reason, the code of external packages(date-fns, object-hash and etc) still in final bundle even if you don't use QDatapicker or QTable. I assume this can be possible resolved by marking them as peerDeps, but i doubt that this is the best decision, so this situation requires further separated investigation.