Closed rifazn closed 3 years ago
The Con class is missing a sway-only attribute, shell, which is included in the sway-ipc specification.
Con
shell
Should this be included for compatibility with sway?
There are other sway-only attributes included within the library (app_id, pid, representation and visible) so this attribute is probably missing here.
app_id
pid
representation
visible
Sway-ipc spec: https://man.archlinux.org/man/sway-ipc.7.en#4._GET_TREE
Yeah go ahead and do a PR for it.
PR: #173
The
Con
class is missing a sway-only attribute,shell
, which is included in the sway-ipc specification.Should this be included for compatibility with sway?
There are other sway-only attributes included within the library (
app_id
,pid
,representation
andvisible
) so this attribute is probably missing here.Sway-ipc spec: https://man.archlinux.org/man/sway-ipc.7.en#4._GET_TREE