Open manulera opened 2 years ago
The warning is a little confusing, and I think it's actually a red herring/false positive.
The issue here is that GO changed since the documentation was written, and this term has no direct part-of relationships any more. The actual return value of []
is correct
Try another term, it will give results, without warning:
>>> list(go['GO:0060887'].objects(go.get_relationship('part_of')))
[Term('GO:0060173', name='limb development')]
FWIW, I usually do this:
>>> [r for r in go['GO:0060887'].relationships]
[Relationship('part_of', name='part of')]
See also #119
Hi @cmungall thanks for the detailed response and the examples, and sorry for the super-late answer. I tried your example and indeed it works. However, I think my question was not well formulated, I meant to ask whether it was possible to get the inverse relationship (what I would think of as a child). For example, for the term GO:0006366, get all these children and the relationship that links them to GO:0006366:
HI @cmungall any advise on this?
Is it possible to access the children of a relationship? For example, with the method
term.subclasses()
I can access all the inverseis_a
relationships. Is there a way to access other relationships this way? E.gregulates
in GO?I am new to the use of ontologies, so I am not sure if that's the case, but this example from the documentation seems to be doing exactly that.
However, when I run it I get this:
Any tips on this?