Jo-CCS
commented
6 years ago On generation of the 4-1 draft schema I ran into naming collision already noted on the pre-discussion with Jukka on this issue evaluation. Due to this I renamed now the "processingStepType" to "processingCategory" to have the complexType naming not defined "processingStepTypeType" or similar confusing definitions. Please review and comment - proposal available here: https://github.com/altoxml/schema/blob/master/v4/alto-4-1_draft.xsd
artunit
cowboyMontana
ntra00
jukervin
cneud
Ra1phM
rajubln
MatthewThomasMiller
evelienket
hanyelsawy
splet
As outlined on the last conference call it was figured out by CCS development team an issue on the new "Processing" node defintion on implementing the new schema version to our product.
The current defined structure is referencing from "Processing" node the complexType "processingStepType":
Intended was the reference of the complexType "processingType" with the classification of the processing operation:
This defined type is not referenced now at all even existing in the schema.
The proposal is just to add the classification missed now as element parallel to the other information which keeps the hierarchy flat as it is now and does not cause a big issue to add this classification as additional property to the "processingStepType" instead of the additional node level like this:
This will remain compatible to 4-0 and will just allow the classification as it was intended from the discussion to cluster the operations commonly if applicable.
Finally also Jukka proposed to add the reference to the processing steps elements not just on page level than also to the sub structures to outline e.g. strings reprocessed with additional operations.
The modified schema result I will upload now as 4-1 (draft) as proposal result for review.