Closed nolanplatt closed 2 years ago
@Akshay-Rohatgi
@PrishaMaiti
@Akshay-Rohatgi
-The code explanation was very indepth and easy to understand and you implemented the college board 2d arrays in your explanation well
@PrishaMaiti
@alvinzhengq
Points: 0.75 for CB to PBL relation 1.2 for Tour of Code, I would actually suggest extra credit on this part because the explanation was very well done for both topics and requires more than a 1.0 .70 for Aesthetics. I only saw the backend code I believe including more like a presentation or CB connection would be really nice and add a pop to the presentation.
Overall 7.1/8
@alvinzhengq
@PrishaMaiti
7.75/8
@Akshay-Rohatgi
Overall, great job. I strongly suggest full credit (8/8), as explained in my thorough notes (three improvements, one suggestion) concerning Akshay's Individual Final 1 video.
@SamiDeshatty
No submission, but communicated that she had internet issues. Will update three improvements + one suggestion once video is provided.
@PrishaMaiti
All in all, I believe Prisha did a fantastic job, with the only recommendation being focusing more on runtime, showing units on College Board on its website, and showing quiz questions. Due to this, I recommend a score of 7.75/8 (-0.25).
@alvinzhengq
After taking a deep analysis at Alvin's Individual Final 1, I believe that he deserves full credit (8/8). Now, I understand that Alvin excluded a runtime look and/or a deep explanation of the related College Board topics, but I think that his extreme explanations of the code and ensuring the audience understands it shows superior understanding of the corresponding topics.
@nolanplatt
@alvinzhengq
@Akshay-Rohatgi
@nolanplatt
@nolanplatt
Glows. Introduction and purpose is very powerful. I fully understand where you are going. Also, you highlighted key things you will incorporate in demo. Mapping of items and even to specific questions is amazing. Grows. Demo is high quality, should of hit on some of the “clean” points a bit more. Video is much longer than requirement -.2. Second demo description run and purpose was a little confusing.
@nolanplatt
@SamiDeshatty
@SamiDeshatty
@nolanplatt
Points: 1.0 for CB to PBL connection, very well versed in topic .75 for Tour of Code I think showing more of the runtime/backend code would be nice .9 for aesthetics. Your presentation and overview in the introduction was very well done and caught the attention of the watcher very well -0.1 for overtime
Overall 7.2/8
@SamiDeshatty
@alvinzhengq
After reviewing Alvin's video, it was clear that his understanding of the code was very high, and he is very experienced in this field. It was great how he used tangibles from his code to further prove his understanding of the code. To be specific, he was very comfortable speaking on his code and he had a lot of confidence which showed his understanding was great.
Alvin's explanation and walkthrough for his RGB Minilab. His explanations were very thorough and detailed, and he highlighted multiple methods, variables and concepts in the code. It was a great explanation and I learned a lot from just watching Alvin's video.
Alvin then went to relate his code to 2 college board topics, Unit 5 and 9. He used 2 tangibles to help provide evidence and visual learning to the explanation. It was a great explanation and the relation to his learning was great.
Overall + improvements
In all honesty, Alvin's video was great and the explanations were thorough, and his tangibles provided great support to his explanations of code. He had great confidence, and was not stuttering throughout the video. I honestly do not have any improvements because this video gave me the impression that Alvin has a very high level of understanding of code, both backend and frontend, and I can see him having a bright future in Computer Science.
grade - 6/6
@alvinzhengq
great CLASS modeling example (3 levels in RGB), using ALGO lab template for, while, recursion
@Akshay-Rohatgi
In both situations, it seemed like we jumped into code. Since this is formal presentation you should be looking for "Hook" or "Engagement", this was not provided.
5.25/6
Comments are just OK. not real passion or energy that I could detect.
1.75/2
@SamiDeshatty
Strong preparation and association with CB units as requested. I saw simple examples and mini lab examples. All of this was very clear and educational. I have been giving 5.5/6 for this type of presentation.
Improvements for me would be to see team PBL vs just mini Lab usage. Also, in this presentation an example of association seen in CB might have been a little better than examples provided. Though, this is very good work.
Regarding comments, not super strong probably would award 1.75/2, but I am taking another .25 as I believe this came in late and one of the comments above indicated such.
Video Links and Scores
Grades and feedback below