Study Week 2 Review

[alvinzhengq]

Final Score: 4.25/4.5

• MCQ results > 50%, (1 or 0)
  • Tangible Link
• FRQs results > 50% (1 or 0), evaluation considers Paper code pictures vs REPL running code.
  • Tangible Link
  • Runtime Link
• Ticket, GH Pages, Corrections, REPL, running FRQs: partial, extreme effort, completed objective (0, .5, .75, 1). This score is to represent review session(s).
  • Github Pages Homepage

[amanj31]

Overall Peer-review score: 4.25/4.5

MCQ: 1/1

• Over 50%
• Corrections are very thorough and all missed problems have an explanation
• Shows high standard of learning

FRQs: 1/1

• 2 FRQs completed
• Screenshots present in GitHub pages
• Code is running on Repl
• One possible addition would be to give the user more choice on repl, such as choosing the number for part 1 or choosing the number of sectors on part 2.

Overall Effort and completition: 0.75/1

• Thorough corrections and FRQ runtime on repl shows a lot of effort, could have gone the extra mile with the inputs in the frqs as mentioned above
• All requirements have been satisfied

Participation: 1/1

• Alvin was here every day last week, participated in AP study sessions and class assignments

Quality of Work: 0.5/0.5

• Alvin completed everything from the requirements
• GitHub pages are well-organized, everything is easy to find
• Shows involvement