amaatouq / netwise

open source project to tackle the problem of long development cycles required to produce software to conduct multi-participant and real-time human experiments online.
1 stars 0 forks source link

Change the name? #20

Closed amaatouq closed 6 years ago

amaatouq commented 6 years ago

tldr: the current possible names we have are: netwise, swift, tajriba, empeiria, empirica.ly ,empirica, Aravi, Arav, Aricenna, socioScope, SHubble

This is the googledoc that explains the context and contains these pieces of information

We might want to change the name of netwise as our framework is not overly optimized for networked experiments (on purpose) and it is a more general purpose experimentation platform. Therefore, these are some suggested names:

Some general ideas for inspiration:

  1. Something related to telescopes: This is inspired by a quote by Duncan Watts (one of the most important Computational Social Scientists):

    • “The internet will be to sociology what the telescope was to physics. This device that makes the previously invisible visible and in so doing drives all types of new scientific discoveries” – Duncan Watts

    • This is a list of names of important telescopes.
  2. Something related to the history of the scientific method:

    • The idea of empirical started with Aristotle's concept of empeiria. Then Ibn Al-Haytham ("Alhazen") and Ibn-Sina ("Avincenna") took this concept (and Avicenna called it Tajriba) and developed it into the foundation of what we call today: the scientific method.
    • A passage discussing Avicenna's tajriba from "The Book of Healing":
      • In the Al-Burhan (On Demonstration) section of the book, Avicenna discussed the philosophy of science and described an early scientific method of inquiry. He discusses Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and significantly diverged from it on several points. Avicenna discussed the issue of a proper methodology for scientific inquiry and the question of “How does one acquire the first principles of a science?” He asked how a scientist would arrive at “the initial axioms or hypotheses of a deductive science without inferring them from some more basic premises?” He explains that the ideal situation is when one grasps that a “relation holds between the terms, which would allow for absolute, universal certainty.” Avicenna then adds two further methods for arriving at the first principles: the ancient Aristotelian method of induction (istiqra), and the method of examination and experimentation (tajriba). Avicenna criticized Aristotelian induction, arguing that “it does not lead to the absolute, universal, and certain premises that it purports to provide.” In its place, he develops a “method of experimentation as a means for scientific inquiry.”

    • Another passage discussing Avicenna's tajriba as a way to get at knowledge:
      • As Avicenna describes it, tajriba ("experience") involves the repeated sensation of some phenomenon that is preserved in memory, e.g., that purging of bile follows ingestion of scammony. It also involves a “hidden” or implicit process of reasoning. We infer that the repeated connection involves an essential relation between two things: e.g., it is not accidental that the purging of bile follows the ingestion of scammony, for regularities cannot be due to chance. This implicit process of reasoning removes doubt. So, experience gives rise to certitude. Avicenna defines certitude in terms of second-order belief: one is certain when one knows that what one has assented to cannot be otherwise. Certitude is not wholly subjective since knowledge of a proposition requires its truth. On the other hand, though experience gives rise to certitude, it does not yield knowledge in the strict sense. For knowledge in the strict sense is both necessary and explanatory. From experience, we derive our certitude that members of a certain species cause something, but experience does not show why.

  3. Keep NetWise:

    • The current name that we have.
  4. ADD HERE ADDITIONAL IDEAS (like the Mayan Cave observatory)

Name suggestions based on the above:

  1. From the telescope analogy:

    • SocioScope
      • pros:
        • It makes you see social interactions that were not observable before!
        • memorable for anglophones
        • catchy
        • domain name available
      • cons:
        • a bit of a tongue twister (but I don't think it is toobad)
    • Swift
      • pros:
        • It makes you see interactions that were not observable before
        • memorable for anglophones
        • catchy
      • cons:
  2. From the History of Science:

    • empeiria from Aristotle (i.e., "experience")
      • pros:
        • Great background story, content, and meaning from the point of view of what our framework is trying to achieve
        • available cheap domain names
        • not many google results in the search anyway
      • cons:
    • empirica mutants of Aristotle's empeiria
      • pros:
        • Great background story, content, and meaning from the point of view of what our framework is trying to achieve
        • easy for anglo's to say
        • the domain empirica.lyis available (which sounds really nice in Arabic)
      • cons:
        • domain name not available (i.e., empirica.io is an algorithmic trading platform for cryptocurrencies)
    • Tajriba or Tajarib (singular or plural), which is the Arabic translation of the Greek “empeiria”
      • pros:
        • Great background story, content, and meaning from the point of view of what our framework is trying to achieve
        • available cheap domain names
        • not many google results in the search anyway
        • It is my favorite (Abdullah)
      • cons:
        • (probably) not memorable for anglophones
          • That might be solved with a little explanation on the origin of the word in the readme, to help lock in the meaning
        • Maybe hard to pronounce?
        • not sure if it is catchy like netwise
    • Combination of the names Aristotle and Avicenna (e.g., Aravi, Arav, Aricenna, etc)
      • pros:
        • nice background story
        • available cheap domain names
      • cons:
        • (probably) not memorable for anglophones
        • probably not catchy
  3. Keeping NetWise

    • pros:
      • we already have the domain
      • it is catchy
    • cons:
      • The platform is not overly optimized for networks, it is more general purpose .. this name might make it too connected to networks and/or Wisdom of the Crowd
chri4354 commented 6 years ago

I do like the idea of the Telescope. E.g. threeMoons (could have a symbol of three connected dots), koinonikoscope (Google and Wikipedia tell me it could be a twist on the greek word telescope, meaning socialScope), SHubble (Social Hubble), etc..

I agree that the names related to the history of science are very interesting but not very anglophone-friendly. Another concern is that it is perhaps less specific of our platform (e.g. they could apply to any scientific product).

I don't have a solution, but will keep thinking about it!

amaatouq commented 6 years ago

@chri4354 I actually like the idea of SocioScope or socioScope. Although it feels like a tongue twister. Keep suggestions coming as you think of them!

I am trying to see if there is something related to the one-sided mirrors used in interrogation rooms. the fact that we can see the participants and they can't see us :p

amaatouq commented 6 years ago

Now the name of the framework is empirica with domain name empirica.ly