Im Artikel untermauern, dass shift von DLPFC nach Cerebellum in between trials überhaupt sichtbar wird

[amaddio]

Ist dieser shift sichtbar?

At the level of systems, motor memories appear to follow a “cascade” pattern (Krakauer & Shadmehr,2006): motor learning initially excites and rapidly induces associative plasticity in one area, for example, primary motor cortex or cerebellar cortex. For a period of hours, this area will remain excited, and the learning will be sensitive to disruption and interference (Brashers-Krug, Shadmehr, & Bizzi, 1996; Stefan etal., 2006). With the passage of time, the activation decreases, and the learning becomes more stable and

period of hours !

Aus

Seidler, R. D., Benson, B. L., Boyden, N. B., & Kwak, Y. (2013). Motor Skill Learning 20. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, Volume 1: Core Topics, 1, 416.

[amaddio]

"It should be noted that correcting errors within a trial does not seem to be a prerequisite to learning,which is reected as correcting errors from one trial to the next, or across-trial corrections. This isevidenced by experiments showing that learning occurs even when participants have insucient time formaking corrections. Thus it seems that just experiencing or detecting an error is sucient to stimulatemotor learning."

"Thus it seems that just experiencing or detecting an error is sucient to stimulate motor learning."

==> EBA ausreichend

"The series of studies described above supports a role for the prefrontal ACC system in motor errorprocessing. The actual mechanism of how the ERN contributes to performance improvements across trialsduring motor learning is not well understood, however. Additionally, it remains unclear whether thissystem works independently of or in collaboration with the cerebellar-based error processing system"