feat: Add example-app-router-with-next-auth-without-i18n-routing

[teplostanski]

Adding Authentication with next-auth to the example-app-router-without-i18n-routing

This pull request expands the functionality of the existing example by adding user authentication using the next-auth library. The application now supports authentication and allows you to protect routes that require authorization.

[vercel[bot]]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
next-intl-example-app-router	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Oct 2, 2024 4:10pm
next-intl-example-app-router-without-i18n-routing	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Oct 2, 2024 4:10pm

[vercel[bot]]

@teplostanski is attempting to deploy a commit to the next-intl Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[amannn]

Hey @teplostanski, thank you so much for proposing this example—looks like you spent quite some time on it! ❤️

That being said, the existing example-app-router-without-i18n-routing is intended to stay without an actual auth service integration to serve more as a routing inspiration. We also have another example example-app-router-next-auth that demonstrates a demo setup with Auth.js.

As examples take significant time to maintain, I'd prefer to not add another example that showcases a demonstration of both examples combined—I believe the important patterns should be covered in either example.

Have you considered though to publish your example as a separate repo under your username? I know that quite a few users are looking for a Auth.js v5 example (see https://github.com/amannn/next-intl/issues/596). In this repo I'm currently waiting for the v5 stable version to drop, but in case you're interesting in upgrading your example to v5, you could link to it in the thread at https://github.com/amannn/next-intl/issues/596 for example.

Hope this makes sense, keep up the good work! 🙌

[amannn]

Closing this due to inactivity …