Open amannn opened 1 year ago
It would be an extremely useful feature that speeds up the development)
@amannn I guess this will also help with having different objects of translations for each locale? Currently i load my translations async, but one locale might have more and different translations then the rest.
any updates on this one?
You can add a global.d.ts
file in the root of your project and it should work
type Messages = typeof import("./messages/en.json");
declare interface IntlMessages extends Messages {}
You can add a
global.d.ts
file in the root of your project and it should worktype Messages = typeof import("./messages/en.json"); declare interface IntlMessages extends Messages {}
But it does not check arguments, isn't it? i.e. {name}
in the example
{
"hello": "Hello {name}"
}
You can add a
global.d.ts
file in the root of your project and it should worktype Messages = typeof import("./messages/en.json"); declare interface IntlMessages extends Messages {}
But it does not check arguments, isn't it? i.e.
{name}
in the example{ "hello": "Hello {name}" }
No it doesn't, as the creator said this requires typescript vodoooooo, you need to use template literal parsing with some kind of recursivity and this might happen. That's a nice first contribution to do.
This is coming in next-intl@4
! (see https://github.com/amannn/next-intl/pull/1499)
Awesome! Great work
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
next-intl provides opt-in strict typing for messages. With some additional TypeScript voodoo, it might be possible to support type checking for arguments that need to be passed to
t
calls.Resources:
Describe the solution you'd like
We have to evaluate though what it takes to support everything from ICU and also rich text.
Also we should be sure about the performance implications of this (see also https://github.com/amannn/next-intl/issues/792).
Open question: Since we support
defaultTranslationValues
, type-safety would only cover types (ie. accept only strings, numbers, etc), but not if an argument is provided or not (it could come from the defaults). This begs the question ifdefaultTranslationValues
are really a good idea or if we should get rid of this. https://github.com/amannn/next-intl/issues/611 discusses a separate issue but also comes to the conclusion thatdefaultTranslationValues
might be helpful to remove—an alternative is suggested there too.Describe alternatives you've considered
Not introducing types for this