Closed desaikd closed 2 years ago
There is a bug in loading schema that has a definition which uses a type reference from the following part of the schema.
Example:
type:: { name: a, type: b // <--- this is defined in the following part of schema }, type::{ name: b, type: int }
The above schema throws following error:
UnresolvableSchemaError { description: "Could not resolve type reference: \"b\" does not exist" }
This is because it doesn't keep track of following part of schema where other type definitions are defined.
There is a bug in loading schema that has a definition which uses a type reference from the following part of the schema.
Example:
The above schema throws following error:
This is because it doesn't keep track of following part of schema where other type definitions are defined.