Open hyunjunChhoi opened 2 years ago
Hi, can you try the following command?
python stage1.py --gpu 0 --ds cifar10 --Lambda 0.5 --Lambda2 0 --drp <where_you_store_all_your_datasets> --srp <where_to_save_the_ckpt>
By setting Lambda2
as 0
, we are removing the PASCL loss. By setting Lambda
as 0.5
, we are using the OE loss.
Let me know if you have further questions.
Thank you!
Thanks for your answer.
I can reproduce the OE model
However, I cannot reproduce the EnergyOE
Accuracy of the EnergyOE is far behind from the report of paper
How can I reproduce the EnergyOE ????(I just pasted the EnergyOE fine-tuning code and learn)
Hi, can you try the following command?
python stage1.py --gpu 0 --ds cifar10 --Lambda 0.5 --Lambda2 0 --drp <where_you_store_all_your_datasets> --srp <where_to_save_the_ckpt>
By setting
Lambda2
as0
, we are removing the PASCL loss. By settingLambda
as0.5
, we are using the OE loss.Let me know if you have further questions.
Thank you!
Hi, thanks to your great work. But I have recently failed to re-produce the results of OE in your paper (e.g., Texture, the 92.59% AUROC and 83.32% AUPR, CIFAR10-LT) by the provided train command and pretrained model. I got the results of:
Texture: 90.77 (AUROC), 73.99 (AUPR)
Any suggestion?
Hello, Thanks for your work.
How can we train the baseline model such as OE (outlier exposure)
I cannot approach the similar baseline with the OE original code
Could you help