Open neeleshb opened 4 months ago
@vipranarayan14 this seems like a good first issue! If you're interested, I'll help you through it.
Yeah I will take this up!
@vipranarayan14 how is this going?
@akprasad I'm currently tied up. I don't think I can take this up any time soon. Sorry.
The verb सन्स्त् (2.74) has a 3-letter संयोग - न् + स् + त् . Now, whether the last 2 letters "स् + त्" can be separately called a संयोग or not is debatable and both views exist. How does that matter? If स् + त् is considered a संयोग on its own, then स्कोः संयोगाद्योरन्ते च will remove the स्, giving forms like सन्ति / सन्त्ति । And if स् + त् is not considered a संयोग then we will get current forms, संस्ति / संस्त्ति ।
Both the pathways should be supported.