Camel casing?

[geelen]

I think https://github.com/suitcss/suit/blob/master/doc/naming-conventions.md is a pretty good starting point for names, so I've gone with (using am- as our prefix)

<tag am-traitName='value two three'>
<tag am-ModuleName>
<tag am-ModuleName="variant-name">
<tag am-ModuleName-ElementName>
<tag am-ModuleName-ElementName="variant-name">

thoughts? We could also do am-ModuleName-elementName or am-ModuleName__ElementName, or potentially even the much more BEM-y am-module-name__element-name, but I think it looks arse.

[benschwarz]

Its worth having a read of https://github.com/suitcss/suit/issues/80#issuecomment-46094932 to get a bit of perspective for why suit does what it does.

<tag am-CamelCase>
<tag am-CamelCase-ElementName>

Looks good to me. I don't think that sub elements should often have variants… but otherwise, I think syntactically we're borrowing the right things from BEM, then suit.

[geelen]

Good thing to remember is that attribute values (like class names) are case sensitive but atrribute names are not

On Saturday, August 23, 2014, Ben Schwarz notifications@github.com wrote:

Its worth having a read of suitcss/suit#80 (comment) https://github.com/suitcss/suit/issues/80#issuecomment-46094932 to get a bit of perspective for why suit does what it does.

Looks good to me. I don't think that sub elements should often have variants… but otherwise, I think syntactically we're borrowing the right things from BEM, then suit. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/amcss/attribute-module-specification/issues/3#issuecomment-53116796 .

[benschwarz]

I’d not really considered that since we started talking about am-, but I think it’ll be ok none the less.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Glen Maddern notifications@github.com wrote:

Good thing to remember is that attribute values (like class names) are case sensitive but atrribute names are not On Saturday, August 23, 2014, Ben Schwarz notifications@github.com wrote:

Its worth having a read of suitcss/suit#80 (comment) https://github.com/suitcss/suit/issues/80#issuecomment-46094932 to get a bit of perspective for why suit does what it does.

Looks good to me. I don't think that sub elements should often have variants… but otherwise, I think syntactically we're borrowing the right things from BEM, then suit. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/amcss/attribute-module-specification/issues/3#issuecomment-53116796 . --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/amcss/attribute-module-specification/issues/3#issuecomment-53130513

[geelen]

Yeah, one of the benefits of Nicolas' approach is not clashing with existing lower-case classes. We don't have that problem, so case sensitivity isn't a big deal, and am-ModuleName-Descendent just looks better, even though technically there's a small risk of clashes. But I think we're good.