Closed coreygreenberg closed 5 years ago
Hello mate, thanks for your message.
To explore further I need to know:
Is that on battery or with power connected?
On my settings I prefer to reduce the power usage by disabling turbo boost on battery with this build.
If you remove the disableturboboost kext and reboot this action will stop (remember to clear cache)
Thee graphics are managed by the whatevergreen kext and there may be some restrictions to enable stability.
I feel As long as the graphics are good enough for me to do 3 monitors at high resolution with no lag I am fine.
But really I wouldn't game on a hackintosh or even use a hackintosh laptop for video editing. It is seriously underpowered and more native software is available on windows (except final cut Pro)
I cannot fathom a reason why you would need a faster clock on your GPU and the speed restricted clock leads to stability, better battery life and less heat generated.
Actually: Most people struggle on their hackintosh builds to get the heat down and the battery life up, so actually a clocked down GPU to me sounds like a very good build in deed!
Now I have not actually tested a MacBook Haswell pro for comparison, but a frequency lock may be a native applr feature. Or perhaps it's just the sensor readings and not the actual clock speed. Perhaps the gfx sensor info provided by the kexts is not the true frequency?
To test that:
Have you run system benchmarks on gfx and noticed any numbers very different on windows or Linux with the same laptop?
Benchmark scores wildly different across os's?
Just some ideas and tips for you to consider.
Please let me know your thoughts and how you plan to proceed.
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 15:36 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Might only be cosmetic but Intel Power Gadget shows the HD 4400 iGPU to be locked at .55GHz, even at idle. Everything seems to be working fine but I wonder if maybe the included DSDT and/or SSDT files are somehow overlocking the iGPU? I'm running this package on a Dell E7240. Thanks in advance for any feedback.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LMETKFQUMKQEK4E2YDQHJ6X7A5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HIS4EJA, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LOBDUH3SPAVHFUUAM3QHJ6X7ANCNFSM4IST3D4Q .
Mate! I cannot thank you enough for sharing your Dell files. I have 2 E7240s that I’ve never been able to really get Hackintoshed all the way to usability until I found your Git and got both my Dells to fully working Mojave machines. You are a genius!
I’m with you on disabling turbo, I did that in BIOS anyway. No real benefit on such lightweight hardware.
I think maybe I wasn’t as clear about the locked .55GHz iGPU as I should have been. .55GHz seems to be the baseline as reported by Intel Power Gadget. When I push the HD-4400 with Geekbench graphics benchmarks, Intel Power Gadget shows GPU frequency scaling up as you would expect. But instead of the range being 0 as the baseline, it never dips below .55GHz whether on battery or AC. Oddly enough if I look at Activity Monitor, it shows the GPU scaling from 0 to whatever. But Intel Power Gadget seems to see the GPU idling at .55GHz, which is a pretty significant load when the system’s at idle.
This may be entirely cosmetic and Intel’s app is misreading the GPU while Apple’s Activity Monitor is showing the actual state. I just wanted to run it by you in case you were seeing the same thing.
Again, thanks for the files! You are the only one who’s managed to crack the code on these Dells.
Best regards, Corey Greenberg
On Aug 31, 2019, at 4:17 PM, Arun Shah notifications@github.com wrote:
Hello mate, thanks for your message.
To explore further I need to know:
Is that on battery or with power connected?
On my settings I prefer to reduce the power usage by disabling turbo boost on battery with this build.
If you remove the disableturboboost kext and reboot this action will stop (remember to clear cache)
Thee graphics are managed by the whatevergreen kext and there may be some restrictions to enable stability.
I feel As long as the graphics are good enough for me to do 3 monitors at high resolution with no lag I am fine.
But really I wouldn't game on a hackintosh or even use a hackintosh laptop for video editing. It is seriously underpowered and more native software is available on windows (except final cut Pro)
I cannot fathom a reason why you would need a faster clock on your GPU and the speed restricted clock leads to stability, better battery life and less heat generated.
Actually: Most people struggle on their hackintosh builds to get the heat down and the battery life up, so actually a clocked down GPU to me sounds like a very good build in deed!
Now I have not actually tested a MacBook Haswell pro for comparison, but a frequency lock may be a native applr feature. Or perhaps it's just the sensor readings and not the actual clock speed. Perhaps the gfx sensor info provided by the kexts is not the true frequency?
To test that:
Have you run system benchmarks on gfx and noticed any numbers very different on windows or Linux with the same laptop?
Benchmark scores wildly different across os's?
Just some ideas and tips for you to consider.
Please let me know your thoughts and how you plan to proceed.
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 15:36 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Might only be cosmetic but Intel Power Gadget shows the HD 4400 iGPU to be locked at .55GHz, even at idle. Everything seems to be working fine but I wonder if maybe the included DSDT and/or SSDT files are somehow overlocking the iGPU? I'm running this package on a Dell E7240. Thanks in advance for any feedback.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LMETKFQUMKQEK4E2YDQHJ6X7A5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HIS4EJA, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LOBDUH3SPAVHFUUAM3QHJ6X7ANCNFSM4IST3D4Q .
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
No probs pal.
It's not all me its I have simply compiled packs from others and made changes to it.
Now in regards to sensor readings, it's true they can be all over the place as whatevergreen is sending sensors.
You have to appreciate the macOS desktop is quite graphics heavy in the first place (the Cocao framework) which is why 8ts buttery smooth most of the time.
I think hd4600 is supposed to scale from 200mhz to 1350mhz so I will see if I can bring the graphics down a bit without effecting performance.
It might just be a reading error.
Anyway I hardly use my Dells as a hackintosh now as I moved to a t440p ThinkPad that's quad core and triple SSD with better cooling (the ultra low voltage dual cores are not great for development)
But I am glad your enjoying it and this pack works well for you.
I will see what can be done in the rest of ssdt to bring down the gpu baseline
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 21:55 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Mate! I cannot thank you enough for sharing your Dell files. I have 2 E7240s that I’ve never been able to really get Hackintoshed all the way to usability until I found your Git and got both my Dells to fully working Mojave machines. You are a genius!
I’m with you on disabling turbo, I did that in BIOS anyway. No real benefit on such lightweight hardware.
I think maybe I wasn’t as clear about the locked .55GHz iGPU as I should have been. .55GHz seems to be the baseline as reported by Intel Power Gadget. When I push the HD-4400 with Geekbench graphics benchmarks, Intel Power Gadget shows GPU frequency scaling up as you would expect. But instead of the range being 0 as the baseline, it never dips below .55GHz whether on battery or AC. Oddly enough if I look at Activity Monitor, it shows the GPU scaling from 0 to whatever. But Intel Power Gadget seems to see the GPU idling at .55GHz, which is a pretty significant load when the system’s at idle.
This may be entirely cosmetic and Intel’s app is misreading the GPU while Apple’s Activity Monitor is showing the actual state. I just wanted to run it by you in case you were seeing the same thing.
Again, thanks for the files! You are the only one who’s managed to crack the code on these Dells.
Best regards, Corey Greenberg
On Aug 31, 2019, at 4:17 PM, Arun Shah notifications@github.com wrote:
Hello mate, thanks for your message.
To explore further I need to know:
Is that on battery or with power connected?
On my settings I prefer to reduce the power usage by disabling turbo boost on battery with this build.
If you remove the disableturboboost kext and reboot this action will stop (remember to clear cache)
Thee graphics are managed by the whatevergreen kext and there may be some restrictions to enable stability.
I feel As long as the graphics are good enough for me to do 3 monitors at high resolution with no lag I am fine.
But really I wouldn't game on a hackintosh or even use a hackintosh laptop for video editing. It is seriously underpowered and more native software is available on windows (except final cut Pro)
I cannot fathom a reason why you would need a faster clock on your GPU and the speed restricted clock leads to stability, better battery life and less heat generated.
Actually: Most people struggle on their hackintosh builds to get the heat down and the battery life up, so actually a clocked down GPU to me sounds like a very good build in deed!
Now I have not actually tested a MacBook Haswell pro for comparison, but a frequency lock may be a native applr feature. Or perhaps it's just the sensor readings and not the actual clock speed. Perhaps the gfx sensor info provided by the kexts is not the true frequency?
To test that:
Have you run system benchmarks on gfx and noticed any numbers very different on windows or Linux with the same laptop?
Benchmark scores wildly different across os's?
Just some ideas and tips for you to consider.
Please let me know your thoughts and how you plan to proceed.
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 15:36 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Might only be cosmetic but Intel Power Gadget shows the HD 4400 iGPU to be locked at .55GHz, even at idle. Everything seems to be working fine but I wonder if maybe the included DSDT and/or SSDT files are somehow overlocking the iGPU? I'm running this package on a Dell E7240. Thanks in advance for any feedback.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LMETKFQUMKQEK4E2YDQHJ6X7A5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HIS4EJA , or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LOBDUH3SPAVHFUUAM3QHJ6X7ANCNFSM4IST3D4Q
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LOWAHJ3Y5ZQWWCHPJLQHLLFHA5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5TVB2Y#issuecomment-526864619, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LPDEG7VYICUAITH3O3QHLLFHANCNFSM4IST3D4Q .
Well whatever packs you collected from others must be hidden deep in the dark web because I searched high and low for the lowdown on making these Dells work as MacBooks and nothing I Googled worked even minimally until I found your stuff. So thanks again for sharing it.
I can see why you moved on to the Thinkpad. It’s a beast. For my needs the 7240 is perfect, more than enough grunt and a smaller and lighter package. My iPad Pro’s screen has ruined commodity 1366x768 TN panels for me but it’s fine for what I do.
I’m curious whether your Clover config is overclocking the HD 4400 just a bit, or if Intel Power Gadget is somehow misreading the GPU sensor. I’ve never seen this kind of disparity with any of my other (admittedly desktop) Hacks. Intel Power Gadget always tracks precisely with Activity Monitor. This is the first time I see different GPU frequencies from these two monitors. But this is really the only issue I’m seeing with your Clover package. The e7240 is running Mojave superbly, and everything just works. Sleep/wake, Metal, iMessage, everything. I’ve never had such luck with Hackintoshing any other laptop. Thanks again for sharing your work.
On Aug 31, 2019, at 6:08 PM, Arun Shah notifications@github.com wrote:
No probs pal.
It's not all me its I have simply compiled packs from others and made changes to it.
Now in regards to sensor readings, it's true they can be all over the place as whatevergreen is sending sensors.
You have to appreciate the macOS desktop is quite graphics heavy in the first place (the Cocao framework) which is why 8ts buttery smooth most of the time.
I think hd4600 is supposed to scale from 200mhz to 1350mhz so I will see if I can bring the graphics down a bit without effecting performance.
It might just be a reading error.
Anyway I hardly use my Dells as a hackintosh now as I moved to a t440p ThinkPad that's quad core and triple SSD with better cooling (the ultra low voltage dual cores are not great for development)
But I am glad your enjoying it and this pack works well for you.
I will see what can be done in the rest of ssdt to bring down the gpu baseline
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 21:55 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Mate! I cannot thank you enough for sharing your Dell files. I have 2 E7240s that I’ve never been able to really get Hackintoshed all the way to usability until I found your Git and got both my Dells to fully working Mojave machines. You are a genius!
I’m with you on disabling turbo, I did that in BIOS anyway. No real benefit on such lightweight hardware.
I think maybe I wasn’t as clear about the locked .55GHz iGPU as I should have been. .55GHz seems to be the baseline as reported by Intel Power Gadget. When I push the HD-4400 with Geekbench graphics benchmarks, Intel Power Gadget shows GPU frequency scaling up as you would expect. But instead of the range being 0 as the baseline, it never dips below .55GHz whether on battery or AC. Oddly enough if I look at Activity Monitor, it shows the GPU scaling from 0 to whatever. But Intel Power Gadget seems to see the GPU idling at .55GHz, which is a pretty significant load when the system’s at idle.
This may be entirely cosmetic and Intel’s app is misreading the GPU while Apple’s Activity Monitor is showing the actual state. I just wanted to run it by you in case you were seeing the same thing.
Again, thanks for the files! You are the only one who’s managed to crack the code on these Dells.
Best regards, Corey Greenberg
On Aug 31, 2019, at 4:17 PM, Arun Shah notifications@github.com wrote:
Hello mate, thanks for your message.
To explore further I need to know:
Is that on battery or with power connected?
On my settings I prefer to reduce the power usage by disabling turbo boost on battery with this build.
If you remove the disableturboboost kext and reboot this action will stop (remember to clear cache)
Thee graphics are managed by the whatevergreen kext and there may be some restrictions to enable stability.
I feel As long as the graphics are good enough for me to do 3 monitors at high resolution with no lag I am fine.
But really I wouldn't game on a hackintosh or even use a hackintosh laptop for video editing. It is seriously underpowered and more native software is available on windows (except final cut Pro)
I cannot fathom a reason why you would need a faster clock on your GPU and the speed restricted clock leads to stability, better battery life and less heat generated.
Actually: Most people struggle on their hackintosh builds to get the heat down and the battery life up, so actually a clocked down GPU to me sounds like a very good build in deed!
Now I have not actually tested a MacBook Haswell pro for comparison, but a frequency lock may be a native applr feature. Or perhaps it's just the sensor readings and not the actual clock speed. Perhaps the gfx sensor info provided by the kexts is not the true frequency?
To test that:
Have you run system benchmarks on gfx and noticed any numbers very different on windows or Linux with the same laptop?
Benchmark scores wildly different across os's?
Just some ideas and tips for you to consider.
Please let me know your thoughts and how you plan to proceed.
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 15:36 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Might only be cosmetic but Intel Power Gadget shows the HD 4400 iGPU to be locked at .55GHz, even at idle. Everything seems to be working fine but I wonder if maybe the included DSDT and/or SSDT files are somehow overlocking the iGPU? I'm running this package on a Dell E7240. Thanks in advance for any feedback.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LMETKFQUMKQEK4E2YDQHJ6X7A5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HIS4EJA , or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LOBDUH3SPAVHFUUAM3QHJ6X7ANCNFSM4IST3D4Q
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LOWAHJ3Y5ZQWWCHPJLQHLLFHA5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5TVB2Y#issuecomment-526864619, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LPDEG7VYICUAITH3O3QHLLFHANCNFSM4IST3D4Q .
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
One thing I forgot to mention -- although About This Mac correctly ID's the GPU as Intel HD 4400, Activity Monitor shows it as Intel Iris Pro Graphics. As I said, graphics seem to be working fine, but if Activity Monitor thinks the GPU is a different chipset, maybe that's why it shows different readings than Intel Power Gadget.
Tip 1: both my e7240's are 1080p lcd's
You should grab one of eBay and swap it over if you get a chance, however 1080p Res on 12.5inch can makes things a little too small, but nothing highdpi scaling won't fix.
Secondly, I use virtualsmc with this pack I believe.
It has improvements over fakesmc+sensors but lacks as many sensors as fakesmc.
If you feel like trying it out, grab fakesmc+ sensors (you can download it using clover configurator)
And delete the virtualsmcdriver and I stall the SMC driver, this will give you more sensors including GPU.
I would advise you backup your efi partition before making any changes, or perhaps put the modified efi on a usb stick and boot from the usb to see if changes help you.
On Sun, 1 Sep 2019, 17:28 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Well whatever packs you collected from others must be hidden deep in the dark web because I searched high and low for the lowdown on making these Dells work as MacBooks and nothing I Googled worked even minimally until I found your stuff. So thanks again for sharing it.
I can see why you moved on to the Thinkpad. It’s a beast. For my needs the 7240 is perfect, more than enough grunt and a smaller and lighter package. My iPad Pro’s screen has ruined commodity 1366x768 TN panels for me but it’s fine for what I do.
I’m curious whether your Clover config is overclocking the HD 4400 just a bit, or if Intel Power Gadget is somehow misreading the GPU sensor. I’ve never seen this kind of disparity with any of my other (admittedly desktop) Hacks. Intel Power Gadget always tracks precisely with Activity Monitor. This is the first time I see different GPU frequencies from these two monitors. But this is really the only issue I’m seeing with your Clover package. The e7240 is running Mojave superbly, and everything just works. Sleep/wake, Metal, iMessage, everything. I’ve never had such luck with Hackintoshing any other laptop. Thanks again for sharing your work.
On Aug 31, 2019, at 6:08 PM, Arun Shah notifications@github.com wrote:
No probs pal.
It's not all me its I have simply compiled packs from others and made changes to it.
Now in regards to sensor readings, it's true they can be all over the place as whatevergreen is sending sensors.
You have to appreciate the macOS desktop is quite graphics heavy in the first place (the Cocao framework) which is why 8ts buttery smooth most of the time.
I think hd4600 is supposed to scale from 200mhz to 1350mhz so I will see if I can bring the graphics down a bit without effecting performance.
It might just be a reading error.
Anyway I hardly use my Dells as a hackintosh now as I moved to a t440p ThinkPad that's quad core and triple SSD with better cooling (the ultra low voltage dual cores are not great for development)
But I am glad your enjoying it and this pack works well for you.
I will see what can be done in the rest of ssdt to bring down the gpu baseline
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 21:55 coreygreenberg, notifications@github.com wrote:
Mate! I cannot thank you enough for sharing your Dell files. I have 2 E7240s that I’ve never been able to really get Hackintoshed all the way to usability until I found your Git and got both my Dells to fully working Mojave machines. You are a genius!
I’m with you on disabling turbo, I did that in BIOS anyway. No real benefit on such lightweight hardware.
I think maybe I wasn’t as clear about the locked .55GHz iGPU as I should have been. .55GHz seems to be the baseline as reported by Intel Power Gadget. When I push the HD-4400 with Geekbench graphics benchmarks, Intel Power Gadget shows GPU frequency scaling up as you would expect. But instead of the range being 0 as the baseline, it never dips below .55GHz whether on battery or AC. Oddly enough if I look at Activity Monitor, it shows the GPU scaling from 0 to whatever. But Intel Power Gadget seems to see the GPU idling at .55GHz, which is a pretty significant load when the system’s at idle.
This may be entirely cosmetic and Intel’s app is misreading the GPU while Apple’s Activity Monitor is showing the actual state. I just wanted to run it by you in case you were seeing the same thing.
Again, thanks for the files! You are the only one who’s managed to crack the code on these Dells.
Best regards, Corey Greenberg
On Aug 31, 2019, at 4:17 PM, Arun Shah notifications@github.com wrote:
Hello mate, thanks for your message.
To explore further I need to know:
Is that on battery or with power connected?
On my settings I prefer to reduce the power usage by disabling turbo boost on battery with this build.
If you remove the disableturboboost kext and reboot this action will stop (remember to clear cache)
Thee graphics are managed by the whatevergreen kext and there may be some restrictions to enable stability.
I feel As long as the graphics are good enough for me to do 3 monitors at high resolution with no lag I am fine.
But really I wouldn't game on a hackintosh or even use a hackintosh laptop for video editing. It is seriously underpowered and more native software is available on windows (except final cut Pro)
I cannot fathom a reason why you would need a faster clock on your GPU and the speed restricted clock leads to stability, better battery life and less heat generated.
Actually: Most people struggle on their hackintosh builds to get the heat down and the battery life up, so actually a clocked down GPU to me sounds like a very good build in deed!
Now I have not actually tested a MacBook Haswell pro for comparison, but a frequency lock may be a native applr feature. Or perhaps it's just the sensor readings and not the actual clock speed. Perhaps the gfx sensor info provided by the kexts is not the true frequency?
To test that:
Have you run system benchmarks on gfx and noticed any numbers very different on windows or Linux with the same laptop?
Benchmark scores wildly different across os's?
Just some ideas and tips for you to consider.
Please let me know your thoughts and how you plan to proceed.
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, 15:36 coreygreenberg, <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Might only be cosmetic but Intel Power Gadget shows the HD 4400 iGPU to be locked at .55GHz, even at idle. Everything seems to be working fine but I wonder if maybe the included DSDT and/or SSDT files are somehow overlocking the iGPU? I'm running this package on a Dell E7240. Thanks in advance for any feedback.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
,
or mute the thread <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LOBDUH3SPAVHFUUAM3QHJ6X7ANCNFSM4IST3D4Q
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LOWAHJ3Y5ZQWWCHPJLQHLLFHA5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5TVB2Y#issuecomment-526864619 , or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LPDEG7VYICUAITH3O3QHLLFHANCNFSM4IST3D4Q
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ameeno/Dell-E7440-Hackintosh/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC64LJO7YLWQEFHSGRZ723QHPUTJA5CNFSM4IST3D42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5UF4LA#issuecomment-526933548, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC64LKHE6X2ORCDDNVOYODQHPUTJANCNFSM4IST3D4Q .
I tried subbing FakeSMC.kext for VirtualSMC.kext, and I added all the SMC sensors that Clover Configurator offers when installing FakeSMC. Rebooted without issue, lost the battery menu icon but otherwise all was well. Intel Power Gadget and Activity Monitor showed the same GPU behavior as with VirtualSMC, no changes. HWMonitor didn't seem to show any GPU info, only CPU.
I've thought about swapping these E7240s for the version with the 1080 screen but honestly these do me just fine for what I want from a laptop. Simple web browsing and text editing is fine on 1366 TN. That E7240 1080 screen is a touchscreen, yes? Does touchscreen work at all with MacOS?
I really appreciate your help. At this point I'm going to chalk it up to bad sensor reading and assume the HD 4400 is not getting overclocked somehow. I'll do some more digging into how the Intel GPU is spoofed in Clover, maybe it's got some holdover code from someone's Iris Pro installation.
Hello there, yes my touch screen 1080p works with macosx.
But the touch screen does add some weight to it.
Yes I found the virtualsmc to be better than fakesmc.
Thanks for your feedback.
Might only be cosmetic but Intel Power Gadget shows the HD 4400 iGPU to be locked at .55GHz, even at idle. Everything seems to be working fine but I wonder if maybe the included DSDT and/or SSDT files are somehow overlocking the iGPU? I'm running this package on a Dell E7240. Thanks in advance for any feedback.