Closed lironui closed 2 years ago
I am interested on this too! I want to evalute properly the predicted images based on the provided pre-trained model. But for this I would need to know which images are used for training, validation and testing.
Hi both, sorry for the late reply. I have updated the Readme with the according information. Feel free to reopen if you need more information.
Hi Andrea, thanks for your response. It looks like you have forgotten to make the link to the dataset split public accessible. I getting a message that I have no rights to access the file.
Indeed, fixed now, thank you!
Thanks! I have the file list now but the filenames are not in the same format as the referenced dataset.
Datesetfilelist format: "ROIs1158_spring_101_0.tif" Dataset format: "ROIs1970_fall_93_p128.tif"
I tried to translate the filenames but without success. Could you give a hint, how the previous filenames can be converted such as it matches with the files in the referenced dataset? If this is even possible?
Good question, maybe @PatrickTUM can help with this?
It looks like the split in datasetfilelist.csv was done by the "scene_id"? All parts of one scene should be in the same set.
Is it safe to assume that the "scene_id" in the datasetfilelist.csv is the same as in the referenced dataset? Therefor it would be possible to ignore the part_id.
My understading of the naming format: "ROIs1158spring
Hi @lironui & @P8H,
the test split ROI of SEN12MS-CR are as follows:
'ROIs1158_spring_106', 'ROIs1158_spring_123', 'ROIs1158_spring_140', 'ROIs1158_spring_31', 'ROIs1158_spring_44', 'ROIs1868_summer_119', 'ROIs1868_summer_73', 'ROIs1970_fall_139', 'ROIs2017_winter_108', 'ROIs2017_winter_63'
You can find the patch-wise information of splits here. The validation split is just a suggestion, and may be adapted to your preferences. Note that the data set released is not identical to the one used in [1], and so the splits aren't exactly identical either. The collected ROI of SEN12MS-CR are a subset of those of [2], and to make it directly comparable to [2] (i.e. to establish pixel-wise correspondences), we applied an additional CRS transform in [3]. This transform, however, was not included in the earlier version of the data set. You can find additional informations wrt the changes in [3].
Hoping this helps! Cheers
[1] Meraner, A., Ebel, P., Zhu, X. X., & Schmitt, M. (2020). Cloud removal in Sentinel-2 imagery using a deep residual neural network and SAR-optical data fusion. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 166, 333-346. [2] Schmitt, Michael, et al. "SEN12MS--A Curated Dataset of Georeferenced Multi-Spectral Sentinel-1/2 Imagery for Deep Learning and Data Fusion." arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.07789 (2019). [3] Ebel, P., Meraner, A., Schmitt, M., & Zhu, X. X. (2020). Multisensor data fusion for cloud removal in global and all-season Sentinel-2 imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
Indeed, that helps! Thanks a lot @PatrickTUM and @ameraner!
Hello,
Could you please tell me the details about the 10 ROIs for validation and 10 ROIs for testing?
Regards.