search

american-art / npg

National Portrait Gallery
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
1 stars 6 forks source link

Missing terms from CIDOC-CRM ontology #57

Closed rhao closed 8 years ago

rhao commented 8 years ago

I noticed in some issues, such as #15 and #16 the suggestion includes E62_String in between E22 and an object (that I'm guessing maps to the data column). As commented on in #15 I'm not totally sure what this intermediate E62_String represents. Also, given the ontology loaded in karma, I can't create E62. @mayaram00 also had this issue I think. Are we missing any files that prevent us from making instances of E62?

rhao commented 8 years ago

The first part of my question was answered in #15 so that's resolved.

I still need to know how to map E62_String, since the CIDOC-CRM E62_String doesn't show up in karma. If I search "string" under "Literal Type", I see xsd:string and xsd:normalizedString, but if I try to use that, I get the error "Semantic type not valid!" Suggestions? @caknoblock

rhao commented 8 years ago

So far, I've noticed that karma is missing E61_Time_Primitive, E62_String, P16.1_mode_of_use, P3.1, and I need to use all of these.

mayaram00 commented 8 years ago

I also have this issue for several of the Autry datasets.

rhao commented 8 years ago

E61 and E62 are resolved.

The ontology is missing P16.1 and P3.1. @steads - how should we handle the cases where you suggested using these properties?

steads commented 8 years ago

The CRM is not missing them! But your implementation might not be geared up for them directly. Try using the CRMpc extension. This is the way the CRM-SIG recommends implementing the .1 properties where implementation environments do not support properties of properties.

workergnome commented 8 years ago

Hi there—wrote a response to this problem in Issue 24.

rhao commented 8 years ago

Resolved with the CRMpc file attached in #24