Open VladimirAlexiev opened 7 years ago
I mapped everything except for the shape and the sitter type. I was not sure the Shape goes in as P2_has_type. I felt the object 'has shape' Oval rather than 'is of type' Oval. But if you want me to map it that way, I'll go ahead and do it.
@workergnome @azaroth42 what do you think?
I don't think there's an easy way to explicitly model shape, so thinking of it as a classification rather than a description of geometry makes sense to me...it's not a great as it could be, but I don't know if there's a better middle ground within the CRM.
:+1: to P2. What we mean is "This object is an instance of the class of Oval things".
NPGObjThesTerms2 includes very useful concepts that should be mapped:
I think that Sitter Type should be mapped to crm:P2_has_type such as "individual portrait", "group portrait", "non-portrait"...
The last col (URL Example) applies only if NPG does not map the respective set of concepts to AAT & TGN. If they map the concepts, use AAT directly. For TGN, use
tgn:nnnnn-place
not justtgn:nnnnn