Per @jojolepro's suggestion, use Option<Read<T>> instead of ReadExpect<T> so that we can gracefully handle the case where a resource is missing. For now I'm setting this up to warn about missing resources, but we can change that if it seems like the wrong approach.
Fixes #13
Per @jojolepro's suggestion, use
Option<Read<T>>instead ofReadExpect<T>so that we can gracefully handle the case where a resource is missing. For now I'm setting this up to warn about missing resources, but we can change that if it seems like the wrong approach.