Open AMG024 opened 3 years ago
I meet the same problem . Does anyone reproduce the result in the paper?
I also meet the same problem . Is my data set error? I use RAF-DB data set to train, only get the accuracy of 86.44%.
Anyone try this code? How about the resulut? Please help~
I use RAF-DB data set to train and get the accuracy of 86.25%, and use AffectNet data set to train and get the accuracy of 56.8%. I don't know why the accuracy of AffectNet is too far from the paper result. Does anyone meet same problem?
Now the ms-celeb weight pre-training model cannot be downloaded, can you share it?
请问你有了么,链接还是失效
Now the ms-celeb weight pre-training model cannot be downloaded, can you share it?
Same question!
请问你有了么,链接还是失效
you can check this link https://github.com/zyh-uaiaaaa/relative-uncertainty-learning
I used the msceleb weights pre-training model parameters in the paper to train the model’s accuracy on a certain expression that is not as accurate as the recognition accuracy in the confusion matrix in the paper. The parameters used are the default parameters in the paper, so I want to know how In order to reproduce the recognition accuracy of each expression in the confusion matrix of the paper